Age. (1985)patibility in moms and dad-kid relationship: Root and operations

Age. (1985)patibility in moms and dad-kid relationship: Root and operations

Mutton, M. E., & Gilbride, K. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will incompatible relationship (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). If the I am not beautiful, could you be hot or not?: Physical-attractiveness analysis and you can relationship choice due to the fact a purpose of one’s own appeal. Mental Research, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]

Levinger, G., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in-marriage and other intimate relationship. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may in conflict relationship (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of aspiration. When you look at the J. McV. See (Ed.), Character additionally the choices issues (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). New york: Ronald Drive. [ Hyperlinks ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Forecasting dating relationships future that have insiders’ and you may outsiders’ direction: Whom and you will what is actually questioned issues. Private Relationship, 13, 349-362. [ Website links ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and relationship quality inside newly weds: Two based means. Log out of Identification and Societal Therapy, 88, 304-326. [ Website links ]

Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Elizabeth. Roentgen. (2006). Observed similarity and relationship profits certainly one of dating people: An idiographic strategy. [ Hyperlinks ]

Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, An excellent. (2006). Matchmaking. Arizona, DC: Declaration to the Pew Websites & Western Existence Investment. Retrieved , off [ Website links ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Examining the precision of forecasts about relationship dating: Just how and just why would lovers’ forecasts change from the individuals created by perceiver? Identity and you will Societal Mindset Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Website links ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing situations from the initiation from heterosexual matchmaking. Papers presented at the Basic All over the world Appointment towards the Personal Matchmaking, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]

Record off Personal and private Dating, 23, 865-880

Montoya, R. M., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is real similarity very important to interest? An effective meta-investigation out-of actual and you can recognized similarity. Record away from Social and personal Dating, 25, 889-922. [ Website links ]

Electronic matchmaking and you will virtual relevant: Conceptualizing computers mediated intimate relationships

Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationships fulfillment while the an excellent predictor out-of resemblance recommendations; A test of the attraction-resemblance theory. Record out of Personal and private Relationship, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Backlinks ]

Morry, M. Yards. (2007). The interest-resemblance theory certainly mix-intercourse loved ones: Relationships satisfaction, detected parallels, and you will mind-providing attitudes. Journal out-of Social and personal Dating, 24, 117-138. [ Hyperlinks ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and you can extension of your own SVR idea of dyadic combining. Journal out-of ily, forty-two, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). That will separation: A 14-12 months longitudinal examination of black colored people and white couples. Diary out-of Personal and personal Dating, 19, 179-202. [ Website links ]

Orenstein, S. (). The fresh love formula Match thinks this has found a formula to own ruling the internet dating providers: A technological strategy to find Mr. or Ms. Correct. Business dos.0 Journal. Recovered on off [ Hyperlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure – Identification parallels in partners. Personality and you may Individual Distinctions, 45, 533-535. [ Hyperlinks ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Spouse tastes: What functions perform everyone desire inside their quick-title sexual and you can much time-label personal couples? Diary out-of Mindset and Human Sexuality, 12, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The fresh new role of your thinking throughout the initiation and span of societal communications. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and in conflict relationship (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]